The Presidential Cycle: Understanding Market Trends After Elections

The Presidential Cycle is a theory that suggests that the United States stock marketNew York Stock Exchange (NYSE)The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is the largest securities exchange in the world, hosting 82% of the S&P 500, as well as 70 of the biggest experiences a decline in the first year a new president takes office. The theory was first developed by Yale Hirsch, a stock market historian. It suggests that the US presidential elections exert a predictable effect on the economy.Market EconomyMarket economy is defined as a system where the production of goods and services are set according to the changing desires and abilities of According to the theory, the stock market starts to improve in the second year after the Presidential election.

Hirsch’s theory was shown valid for most of the 20th century. Some investors even used the presidential cycle as a market timing indicator for the stock market. However, it has since lost its predictive power. In the 21st century, the stock market has surged in the initial year of Presidencies. The S&P 500 index rose in the first years of the Trump, Bush, and Obama Administrations.

The Reasoning behind the Presidential Cycle

Hirsch offered his reasoning on why the election of a new President affects stock market performance.

When the president is elected, he/she has to work towards fulfilling their election promises. This may include taking actions that have a negative effect on the market.

In the third and fourth year of a Presidency, a sitting president will start campaigning again. Having a strong economy is a great way to get votes. Therefore, the President is likely to prioritize programs that aim to heat up the economy. If such programs succeed, this may logically have a positive effect on the stock market.

Is the Cycle Accurate?

Past history of the stock market’s performance shows that there is some validity for using the Presidential cycle as a stock market indicator. However, the cycle has proven unreliable as an indicator in the early 21^st century. Therefore, investors are advised against using the Presidential cycle as a standalone indicator. Instead, they should consider other factors that may potentially influence economic and market conditionsMarket PositioningMarket Positioning refers to the ability to influence consumer perception regarding a brand or product relative to competitors. The objective of market.

There are both systematic risksSystematic RiskSystematic risk is that part of the total risk that is caused by factors beyond the control of a specific company or individual. Systematic risk is caused by factors that are external to the organization. All investments or securities are subject to systematic risk and therefore, it is a non-diversifiable risk. and idiosyncratic risksIdiosyncratic RiskIdiosyncratic risk, also sometimes referred to as unsystematic risk, is the inherent risk involved in investing in a specific asset – such as a stock –  the in the market that go way beyond a Presidential election.

In addition, the US President lacks the power to control what happens in the global political environment. Certainly, actions by the President or Congress may affect the financial markets.

The timing of the President’s term relative to the stock market is just one of the factors influencing market risk. Other factors may include investor psychology, interest ratesInterest RateAn interest rate refers to the amount charged by a lender to a borrower for any form of debt given, generally expressed as a percentage of the principal., and the performance of the global economy.

Case Study: Performance of the S&P 500 during Presidential Election Cycles

The Schwab Center for Financial Research analyzed the S&P 500 market performance from 1950 to 2015 to determine how closely market performance correlated with the Presidential cycles. The study looked at 16 election cycles, in which the first year of the cycle coincides with the first year of the US President’s term. It revealed that in nine of the 16 cycles analyzed, the index finished lower than the rest of the years in a President’s term.

The third year of the cycle was the best year for equities, rising in all but two of the 16 cycles analyzed, and showing an average return of 16.4%. The last year of the cycle, which is also the next election year, was also found to have been good for equities. Overall, stocks rose in 81% of the cycles analyzed, delivering an average return of 6.6%.

Additional Resources

Thank you for reading CFI’s explanation of the Presidential Cycle theory. CFI is the official provider of the Financial Modeling and Valuation Analyst (FMVA)™Become a Certified Financial Modeling & Valuation Analyst (FMVA)®CFI's Financial Modeling and Valuation Analyst (FMVA)® certification will help you gain the confidence you need in your finance career. Enroll today! certification program, designed to transform anyone into a world-class financial analyst.

To keep learning and developing your knowledge of financial analysis, we highly recommend the additional resources below:

• American DreamAmerican DreamThe "American Dream" is a sort of ethos or set of beliefs that drive many U.S. citizens as they work toward creating a life for themselves. These ideals
• Momentum InvestingMomentum InvestingMomentum investing is an investment strategy aimed at purchasing securities that have been showing an upward price trend or short-selling securities that
• Political EconomyPolitical EconomyPolitical economy is a social science that studies production, trade, and their relationship with the law and the government. It is the study of how economic theories affect different socio-economic systems such as socialism and communism, along with the creation and implementation of public policy.
• ReaganomicsReaganomicsReaganomics refers to economic policies put forward by US President Ronald Reagan during his presidency in the 1980s. The policies were